Abstract
In this paper we present a comparison study for three different iterative Krylov methods that we have recently developed for the simultaneous numerical solution of wave propagation problems at multiple frequencies. The three approaches have in common that they require the application of a single shift-and-invert preconditioner at a suitable seed frequency. The focus of the present work, however, lies on the performance of the respective iterative method. We conclude with numerical examples that provide guidance concerning the suitability of the three methods.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS 2017 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Pages | 645-654 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Event | ICCS 2017: 17th International Conference on Computational Science - Zürich, Switzerland Duration: 12 Jun 2017 → 14 Jun 2017 https://www.iccs-meeting.org/iccs2017/ |
Publication series
Name | Procedia Computer Science |
---|---|
Volume | 108C |
ISSN (Print) | 1877-0509 |
Conference
Conference | ICCS 2017 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Switzerland |
City | Zürich |
Period | 12/06/17 → 14/06/17 |
Other | The Art of Computational Science. Bridging Gaps – Forming Alloys |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Time-harmonic elastic wave equation
- global GMRES
- multi-shift GMRES
- shifted Neumann preconditioner
- nested multi-shift Krylov methods