Environmental, Social, Governance scores and the Missing pillar—Why does missing information matter?

Özge Sahin, Karoline Bax, Claudia Czado, Sandra Paterlini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores measure companies' performance concerning sustainability and are organized in three pillars: Environmental, Social, and Governance. These complementary non-financial ESG scores should provide information about companies' ESG performance and risks. However, the extent of not yet published ESG information makes the reliability of ESG scores questionable. To explicitly capture the not yet published information on ESG category scores, a new pillar, the so-called Missing (M) pillar, is proposed and added to the new definition of the Environmental, Social, Governance, and Missing (ESGM) scores. By relying on the data provided by Refinitiv, we show that the ESGM scores strengthen the companies' risk relationship. These new scores could benefit investors and practitioners as ESG exclusion strategies using only ESG scores might exclude assets with a low score solely because of their missing information and not necessarily because of a low ESG merit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1782-1798
Number of pages17
JournalCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental, Social, Governance scores and the Missing pillar—Why does missing information matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this