Evaluation of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions: Implications for membrane modification

Mingliang Chen*, Luuk C. Rietveld, Sebastiaan G.J. Heijman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Membrane modification is commonly applied in water purification and wastewater treatment to reduce fouling of membranes. However, the influence of fouling test methods on evaluating pristine and modified membranes is often overlooked. This study investigates fouling behavior of alumina and SiC-deposited alumina membranes during oil-in-water emulsion filtration under both constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions. Threshold flux was first determined using flux-stepping experiments, with the 90-min SiC-deposited membrane showing the highest value at 95 L m− 2 h− 1. In single-cycle constant flux tests, fouling trends aligned with threshold flux data. However, when backwash was included, fouling characteristics shifted and depended on the permeate flux. Enhanced hydrophilicity and surface charge improved backwash efficiency in modified membranes. Yet, extensive modification negatively affected performance due to significant permeance loss (>57 %). Under constant pressure, fouling was dominated by internal pore blocking, and backwash efficiency was solely linked to membrane permeance, regardless of surface properties. Thus, constant flux filtration with backwash best reflects operational conditions and is recommended for evaluating membrane modifications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number117823
JournalJournal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Constant flux filtration
  • Constant transmembrane pressure filtration
  • Membrane fouling
  • Membrane modification
  • Oil-in-water emulsion
  • Threshold flux

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions: Implications for membrane modification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this