The prosody of French wh-in-situ questions: echo vs. non-echo

A. Glasbergen-Plas*, Stella Gryllia, Jenny Doetjes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares the prosodic properties of French wh-in-situ echo questions and string-identical information seeking questions in relation to focus. Thirty-six (12 3) wh-in-situ questions were embedded in dialogues designed to elicit (A) echo questions expressing auditory failure, (B) information seeking questions with broad focus or (C) information seeking questions with narrow focus on the wh-phrase, i.e. a focus structure similar to the one of echo questions. Analyses regarding the F0, duration and intensity of the utterances produced by 20 native speakers of French show clear prosodic differences between the three conditions. Our results indicate that part of the prosodic properties of echo questions can be attributed to the presence of narrow focus (A and C vs. B) while another part is truly characteristic of echo questions themselves (A vs. B and C). In combination with known differences regarding their pragmatics, semantics and syntax, this sets echo questions apart as a separate question type. At the same time, our results offer evidence for prosodic encoding of focus in French wh-in-situ questions, confirming and adding to existing claims regarding the prosody of focus marking in French on the one hand and the presence of focus marking in wh-interrogatives on the other.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569–603
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Linguistics
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Funding

NWO

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The prosody of French wh-in-situ questions: echo vs. non-echo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this