Finite versus small strain discrete dislocation analysis of cantilever bending of single crystals

N. Irani, Joris J.C. Remmers, Vikram S. Deshpande*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    17 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Plastic size effects in single crystals are investigated by using finite strain and small strain discrete dislocation plasticity to analyse the response of cantilever beam specimens. Crystals with both one and two active slip systems are analysed, as well as specimens with different beam aspect ratios. Over the range of specimen sizes analysed here, the bending stress versus applied tip displacement response has a strong hardening plastic component. This hardening rate increases with decreasing specimen size. The hardening rates are slightly lower when the finite strain discrete dislocation plasticity (DDP) formulation is employed as curving of the slip planes is accounted for in the finite strain formulation. This relaxes the back-stresses in the dislocation pile-ups and thereby reduces the hardening rate. Our calculations show that in line with the pure bending case, the bending stress in cantilever bending displays a plastic size dependence. However, unlike pure bending, the bending flow strength of the larger aspect ratio cantilever beams is appreciably smaller. This is attributed to the fact that for the same applied bending stress, longer beams have lower shear forces acting upon them and this results in a lower density of statistically stored dislocations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)763-777
    JournalActa Mechanica Sinica/Lixue Xuebao
    Volume33
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Bending
    • Dislocations
    • Finite strain
    • Size effects

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Finite versus small strain discrete dislocation analysis of cantilever bending of single crystals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this