Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; Hospital variations in 'textbook outcome'

N. E. Kolfschoten, J. Kievit, G. A. Gooiker, N.J. Van Leersum, H.S. Snijders, E. H. Eddes, R.A.E.M. Tollenaar, M. W.J.M. Wouters, P. J. Marang-Van De Mheen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

252   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Aims: We propose a summarizing measure for outcome indicators, representing the proportion of patients for whom all desired short-term outcomes of care (a 'textbook outcome') is realized. The aim of this study was to investigate hospital variation in the proportion of patients with a 'textbook outcome' after colon cancer resections in the Netherlands. Methods: Patients who underwent a colon cancer resection in 2010 in the Netherlands were included in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. A textbook outcome was defined as hospital survival, radical resection, no reintervention, no ostomy, no adverse outcome and a hospital stay < 14 days. We calculated the number of hospitals with a significantly higher (positive outlier) or lower (negative outlier) Observed/Expected (O/E) textbook outcome than average. As quality measures may be more discriminative in a low-risk population, analyses were repeated for low-risk patients only. Results: A total of 5582 patients, treated in 82 hospitals were included. Average textbook outcome was 49% (range 26-71%). Eight hospitals were identified as negative outliers. In these hospitals a 'textbook outcome' was realized in 35% vs. 52% in average hospitals (p < 0.01). In a sub-Analysis for low-risk patients, only one additional negative outlier was identified. Conclusions: The textbook outcome, representing the proportion of patients with a perfect hospitalization, gives a simple comprehensive summary of hospital performance, while preventing indicator driven practice. Therewith the 'textbook outcome' is meaningful for patients, providers, insurance companies and healthcare inspectorate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-163
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Colorectal neoplasma
  • Comparative assessment
  • Outcomes of care
  • Quality assurance
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; Hospital variations in 'textbook outcome''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this