TY - JOUR
T1 - Fostering responsible anticipation in engineering ethics education
T2 - how a multi-disciplinary enrichment of the responsible innovation framework can help
AU - van Grunsven, Janna
AU - Stone, Taylor
AU - Marin, Lavinia
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - It is crucial for engineers to anticipate the socio-ethical impacts of emerging technologies. Such acts of anticipation are thoroughly normative and should be cultivated in engineering ethics education. In this paper we ask: ‘how do we anticipate the socio-ethical implications of emerging technologies responsibly?’ And ‘how can such responsible anticipation be taught?’ We offer a conceptual answer, building upon the framework of Responsible Innovation and its four core practices: anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. We forge a more explicit link between the practices of anticipation, reflexivity, and inclusion, while also enriching them with insights from disability studies, STS, design theory, and philosophy. On this basis we present responsible anticipation as an activity of reflective problem framing grounded in epistemic humility. Via the RI-practice of responsiveness we present responsible anticipation as a creative approach to engineering ethics, offering engineering students a critical yet productive perspective on how ethics may inform innovation.
AB - It is crucial for engineers to anticipate the socio-ethical impacts of emerging technologies. Such acts of anticipation are thoroughly normative and should be cultivated in engineering ethics education. In this paper we ask: ‘how do we anticipate the socio-ethical implications of emerging technologies responsibly?’ And ‘how can such responsible anticipation be taught?’ We offer a conceptual answer, building upon the framework of Responsible Innovation and its four core practices: anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. We forge a more explicit link between the practices of anticipation, reflexivity, and inclusion, while also enriching them with insights from disability studies, STS, design theory, and philosophy. On this basis we present responsible anticipation as an activity of reflective problem framing grounded in epistemic humility. Via the RI-practice of responsiveness we present responsible anticipation as a creative approach to engineering ethics, offering engineering students a critical yet productive perspective on how ethics may inform innovation.
KW - anticipation
KW - disability studies
KW - engineering ethics education
KW - epistemic humility
KW - problem framing
KW - Responsible innovation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161464573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03043797.2023.2218275
DO - 10.1080/03043797.2023.2218275
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85161464573
SN - 0304-3797
VL - 49
SP - 283
EP - 298
JO - European Journal of Engineering Education
JF - European Journal of Engineering Education
IS - 2
ER -