Fostering responsible anticipation in engineering ethics education: how a multi-disciplinary enrichment of the responsible innovation framework can help

Janna van Grunsven*, Taylor Stone, Lavinia Marin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
109 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is crucial for engineers to anticipate the socio-ethical impacts of emerging technologies. Such acts of anticipation are thoroughly normative and should be cultivated in engineering ethics education. In this paper we ask: ‘how do we anticipate the socio-ethical implications of emerging technologies responsibly?’ And ‘how can such responsible anticipation be taught?’ We offer a conceptual answer, building upon the framework of Responsible Innovation and its four core practices: anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. We forge a more explicit link between the practices of anticipation, reflexivity, and inclusion, while also enriching them with insights from disability studies, STS, design theory, and philosophy. On this basis we present responsible anticipation as an activity of reflective problem framing grounded in epistemic humility. Via the RI-practice of responsiveness we present responsible anticipation as a creative approach to engineering ethics, offering engineering students a critical yet productive perspective on how ethics may inform innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-298
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Engineering Education
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • anticipation
  • disability studies
  • engineering ethics education
  • epistemic humility
  • problem framing
  • Responsible innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fostering responsible anticipation in engineering ethics education: how a multi-disciplinary enrichment of the responsible innovation framework can help'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this