Grappling with Diversity in Research Through Design

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since its introduction, Research through Design (RtD) has taken on a wide variety of forms. Currently, there is a lack of clarity about what connects and separates different RtD approaches. Several attempts have been made to clarify these matters, often in the form of a top-down categorization. Here we start on a different path, one that is open for different points of view and grounded in the ongoing concerns and needs of RtD practitioners. Over a two-month period, we engaged a local research community in weekly discussions about RtD in their work. Thoughts and questions were posted on a dedicated wall-space, maintained, and clustered over the weeks. As a result, we identified 11 themes that indicate concerns among participants about RtD. We suggest the themes can help in articulating different RtD ‘styles’ and ‘genres’, and believe this should be a collaborative and bottom-up effort that crosses disciplinary and institutional boundaries.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSynergy - DRS International Conference 2020
Subtitle of host publicationDRS2020 Research Papers
EditorsS. Boess, M. Cheung, R. Cain
PublisherDesign Research Society
Pages139-151
Number of pages13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
EventDRS 2020 International Conference: Synergy - Online, Brisbane, Australia
Duration: 11 Aug 202014 Aug 2020
http://drs2020.org/virtual/

Conference

ConferenceDRS 2020 International Conference
Abbreviated titleDRS2020
CountryAustralia
CityBrisbane
Period11/08/2014/08/20
Internet address

Keywords

  • Research through Design
  • Practice-Based Research
  • Constructive Design Research
  • Design-Led Research

Cite this