Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis

Arie Purwanto; Anneke Zuiderwijk-van Eijk; Marijn Janssen

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis

Arie Purwanto, Anneke Zuiderwijk-van Eijk, Marijn Janssen

Information and Communication Technology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Citizens are increasingly using Open Government Data (OGD) and engaging with OGD by designing and developing applications. They often do so by collaborating in groups, for example through self-organized groups or government-induced open data engagement initiatives, such as hackathons. The successful use and engagement of OGD by groups of citizens can greatly contribute to the uptake and adoption of OGD in general. However, little is known regarding how groups of citizens develop in OGD engagement. This study aims at exploring and understanding the development stages of citizen groups in OGD engagement. To attain this objective, we conducted a comparative case study of group development stages in two different types of OGD engagement. Our cases show that leadership and diversity of capabilities significantly contribute to the success of citizen groups in OGD engagement. These findings suggest that connecting citizens having a diversity of expertise prior to the OGD engagement event helps to improve its effectiveness. This research is among the first to apply group development stages model in open data engagement studies and thus opening up new research opportunities concerning group developments in the open data literature.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018
Editors	E. Kalampokis, S. Virkar, P. Parycek, O. Glassey, M. Janssen, H.J. Scholl, E. Tambouris
Publisher	Springer
Chapter	5
Pages	48-59
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-319-986890-6
ISBN (Print)	978-3-319-98689-0
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5
Publication status	Published - 2018
Event	17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018: Electronic Government - Krems, Austria Duration: 3 Sept 2018 → 5 Sept 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6

Conference

Conference	17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018
Country/Territory	Austria
City	Krems
Period	3/09/18 → 5/09/18
Other	This book constitutes the proceedings of the 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government, EGOV 2018, held in Krems, Austria, in September 2018, in conjunction with the 10th International Conference on eParticipation, ePart 2018. The 22 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 48 submissions. The papers are clustered under the following topical sections: General E-Government and Open Government; Open Data, Linked Data, and Semantic Web; Smart Governance (Government, Cities and Regions); and Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics and Automated Decision-Making.
Internet address	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6

Bibliographical note

Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives A Comparative Case Studies AnalysisAccepted author manuscript, 180 KB
Purwanto2018_Chapter_GroupDevelopmentStagesInOpenGoFinal published version, 218 KB

Cite this

Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk-van Eijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2018). Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis. In E. Kalampokis, S. Virkar, P. Parycek, O. Glassey, M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, & E. Tambouris (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018 (pp. 48-59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

Purwanto, Arie ; Zuiderwijk-van Eijk, Anneke ; Janssen, Marijn. / Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives : A Comparative Case Studies Analysis. Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018. editor / E. Kalampokis ; S. Virkar ; P. Parycek ; O. Glassey ; M. Janssen ; H.J. Scholl ; E. Tambouris. Springer, 2018. pp. 48-59

@inproceedings{b1fe601f21514ee0bc36db224ac42ddb,

title = "Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis",

abstract = "Citizens are increasingly using Open Government Data (OGD) and engaging with OGD by designing and developing applications. They often do so by collaborating in groups, for example through self-organized groups or government-induced open data engagement initiatives, such as hackathons. The successful use and engagement of OGD by groups of citizens can greatly contribute to the uptake and adoption of OGD in general. However, little is known regarding how groups of citizens develop in OGD engagement. This study aims at exploring and understanding the development stages of citizen groups in OGD engagement. To attain this objective, we conducted a comparative case study of group development stages in two different types of OGD engagement. Our cases show that leadership and diversity of capabilities significantly contribute to the success of citizen groups in OGD engagement. These findings suggest that connecting citizens having a diversity of expertise prior to the OGD engagement event helps to improve its effectiveness. This research is among the first to apply group development stages model in open data engagement studies and thus opening up new research opportunities concerning group developments in the open data literature.",

author = "Arie Purwanto and {Zuiderwijk-van Eijk}, Anneke and Marijn Janssen",

note = "Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository {\textquoteleft}You share, we take care!{\textquoteright} – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.; 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018 : Electronic Government ; Conference date: 03-09-2018 Through 05-09-2018",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-319-98689-0",

pages = "48--59",

editor = "E. Kalampokis and S. Virkar and P. Parycek and O. Glassey and M. Janssen and H.J. Scholl and E. Tambouris",

booktitle = "Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018",

publisher = "Springer",

url = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6",

}

Purwanto, A, Zuiderwijk-van Eijk, A & Janssen, M 2018, Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis. in E Kalampokis, S Virkar, P Parycek, O Glassey, M Janssen, HJ Scholl & E Tambouris (eds), Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018. Springer, pp. 48-59, 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018, Krems, Austria, 3/09/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis. / Purwanto, Arie; Zuiderwijk-van Eijk, Anneke ; Janssen, Marijn.
Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018. ed. / E. Kalampokis; S. Virkar; P. Parycek; O. Glassey; M. Janssen; H.J. Scholl; E. Tambouris. Springer, 2018. p. 48-59.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volume › Conference contribution › Scientific › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives

T2 - 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018

AU - Purwanto, Arie

AU - Zuiderwijk-van Eijk, Anneke

AU - Janssen, Marijn

N1 - Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Citizens are increasingly using Open Government Data (OGD) and engaging with OGD by designing and developing applications. They often do so by collaborating in groups, for example through self-organized groups or government-induced open data engagement initiatives, such as hackathons. The successful use and engagement of OGD by groups of citizens can greatly contribute to the uptake and adoption of OGD in general. However, little is known regarding how groups of citizens develop in OGD engagement. This study aims at exploring and understanding the development stages of citizen groups in OGD engagement. To attain this objective, we conducted a comparative case study of group development stages in two different types of OGD engagement. Our cases show that leadership and diversity of capabilities significantly contribute to the success of citizen groups in OGD engagement. These findings suggest that connecting citizens having a diversity of expertise prior to the OGD engagement event helps to improve its effectiveness. This research is among the first to apply group development stages model in open data engagement studies and thus opening up new research opportunities concerning group developments in the open data literature.

AB - Citizens are increasingly using Open Government Data (OGD) and engaging with OGD by designing and developing applications. They often do so by collaborating in groups, for example through self-organized groups or government-induced open data engagement initiatives, such as hackathons. The successful use and engagement of OGD by groups of citizens can greatly contribute to the uptake and adoption of OGD in general. However, little is known regarding how groups of citizens develop in OGD engagement. This study aims at exploring and understanding the development stages of citizen groups in OGD engagement. To attain this objective, we conducted a comparative case study of group development stages in two different types of OGD engagement. Our cases show that leadership and diversity of capabilities significantly contribute to the success of citizen groups in OGD engagement. These findings suggest that connecting citizens having a diversity of expertise prior to the OGD engagement event helps to improve its effectiveness. This research is among the first to apply group development stages model in open data engagement studies and thus opening up new research opportunities concerning group developments in the open data literature.

UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:b1fe601f-2151-4ee0-bc36-db224ac42ddb

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-3-319-98689-0

SP - 48

EP - 59

BT - Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018

A2 - Kalampokis, E.

A2 - Virkar, S.

A2 - Parycek, P.

A2 - Glassey, O.

A2 - Janssen, M.

A2 - Scholl, H.J.

A2 - Tambouris, E.

PB - Springer

Y2 - 3 September 2018 through 5 September 2018

ER -

Purwanto A, Zuiderwijk-van Eijk A , Janssen M. Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis. In Kalampokis E, Virkar S, Parycek P, Glassey O, Janssen M, Scholl HJ, Tambouris E, editors, Proceedings of 17th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2018. Springer. 2018. p. 48-59 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_5

Group Development Stages in Open Government Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis

Abstract

Conference

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Citizen Engagement with Open Government Data: A Model for Analyzing Factors Influencing Citizen Engagement

Cite this