High cable forces deteriorate pinch force control in voluntary-closing body-powered prostheses

Mona Hichert, David A. Abbink, P.J. Kyberd, Dick H. Plettenburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background It is generally asserted that reliable and intuitive control of upper-limb prostheses requires adequate feedback of prosthetic finger positions and pinch forces applied to objects. Bodypowered prostheses (BPPs) provide the user with direct proprioceptive feedback. Currently available BPPs often require high cable operation forces, which complicates control of the forces at the terminal device. The aim of this study is to quantify the influence of high cable forces on object manipulation with voluntary-closing prostheses. Method Able-bodied male subjects were fitted with a bypass-prosthesis with low and high cable force settings for the prehensor. Subjects were requested to grasp and transfer a collapsible object as fast as they could without dropping or breaking it. The object had a low and a high breaking force setting. Results Subjects conducted significantly more successful manipulations with the low cable force setting, both for the low (33% more) and high (50%) object's breaking force. The time to complete the task was not different between settings during successful manipulation trials. Conclusion High cable forces lead to reduced pinch force control during object manipulation. This implies that low cable operation forces should be a key design requirement for voluntaryclosing BPPs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number0169996
Number of pages13
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Prosthetics
  • Stiffness
  • Arms
  • Hands
  • Forearms
  • Classical mechanics
  • Proprioception
  • Shoulders
  • OA-Fund TU Delft

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High cable forces deteriorate pinch force control in voluntary-closing body-powered prostheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this