Household water treatment and safe storage-effectiveness and economics

Stefanie M L Stubbé*, Alida Pelgrim-Adams, Gabor L. Szántó, Doris Van Halem

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
184 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Household Water Treatment and safe Storage (HWTS) systems aim to provide safe drinking water in an affordable manner to users where safe piped water supply is either not feasible or not reliable. In this study the effectiveness, economic parameters and costs of three selected HWTS systems were identified. The selected systems are SODIS, ceramic filter and biosand filter. These options were selected based on their accessibility, affordability and available scientific data. Data was obtained through peer-reviewed literature, reports, web-pages and informal sources. The findings show a wide dispersion for log removal of effectiveness of the HWTS systems. For bacteria (E. coli), log removals of 1-9 (SODIS), 0.5-7.2 (ceramic) and 0-3 (biosand) were reported. In the case of viruses (mostly echovirus and bacteriophages), log removals of 0-4.3 (SODIS), 0.09-2.4 (ceramic) and 0-7 (biosand) were found. The dispersions of log removals for both bacteria and viruses range from non-protective to highly protective according to WHO performance targets. The reported costs of HWTS systems show a wide range as well. The price per cubic meter water is found to be EUR0-8 (SODIS), EUR-0.37-6.4 (ceramic) and EUR-0.08-12.3 (biosand). The retail prices found are: negligible (SODIS), USD-1.9-30 (ceramic) and USD-7-100 (biosand). No relationship was observed between removal efficiency and economics of the three systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-18
Number of pages10
JournalDrinking Water Engineering and Science
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Household water treatment and safe storage-effectiveness and economics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this