TY - JOUR
T1 - How different sounds affect bodily responses and the perception of odour, light and temperature
T2 - A pilot study on interaction effects within IEQ domains
AU - Bluyssen, Philomena M.
AU - Hamida, Amneh
AU - D’Amico, Alessandro
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - During perception with our senses, interactions of different environmental stressors at brain level might occur. Previous studies have shown cross-modal effects between sound and odour. To test these effects of different sounds and levels of sounds on the perception of sound, temperature, odour, and light, as well as a number of physiological indicators, sixteen students were exposed to four different sounds (two indoor: mechanical ventilation & people talking; two outdoor: quiet rural area & city centre area) and two different sound pressure levels per sound, while sitting in a semi-lab environment. Bodily responses were sampled with wearable devices. Heart rate and breathing rate were monitored using a smart watch; EEG measurements were performed to assess their attention and mental relaxation levels; Acceptability and experience were assessed through a questionnaire to assess their comfort perception. Additionally, each student took a hearing test. The outcome showed when the traffic sound level increased, the students perceived the air as more smelly and less acceptable. The other sounds did not show any cross-modal effect. Moreover, heart rate and breathing rate significantly differed during the different tests, confirming that these two indicators can help to explain the physiological effect of noise as a stressor.
AB - During perception with our senses, interactions of different environmental stressors at brain level might occur. Previous studies have shown cross-modal effects between sound and odour. To test these effects of different sounds and levels of sounds on the perception of sound, temperature, odour, and light, as well as a number of physiological indicators, sixteen students were exposed to four different sounds (two indoor: mechanical ventilation & people talking; two outdoor: quiet rural area & city centre area) and two different sound pressure levels per sound, while sitting in a semi-lab environment. Bodily responses were sampled with wearable devices. Heart rate and breathing rate were monitored using a smart watch; EEG measurements were performed to assess their attention and mental relaxation levels; Acceptability and experience were assessed through a questionnaire to assess their comfort perception. Additionally, each student took a hearing test. The outcome showed when the traffic sound level increased, the students perceived the air as more smelly and less acceptable. The other sounds did not show any cross-modal effect. Moreover, heart rate and breathing rate significantly differed during the different tests, confirming that these two indicators can help to explain the physiological effect of noise as a stressor.
KW - cross-modal effects
KW - interaction effects
KW - lab study
KW - different sounds
KW - indoor environmental stressors
U2 - 10.1080/17508975.2025.2508233
DO - 10.1080/17508975.2025.2508233
M3 - Article
SN - 1750-8975
JO - Intelligent Buildings International
JF - Intelligent Buildings International
M1 - 2508233
ER -