How disturbing is it to be approached for a genetic cascade screening programme for familial hypercholesterolaemia? Psychological impact and screenees' views

M. C. Van Maarle*, M. E.A. Stouthard, P. J. Marang-van de Mheen, N. S. Klazinga, G. J. Bonsel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

55 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the screenees' views on, and the psychological impact of, a family-based genetic screening programme for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and to evaluate non-participation. Methods: Self-administered questionnaires were filled out at the time of screening and after communication of the test result. Non-participants were interviewed by phone. Results: Of the people approached for screening, 2% did not participate. These 2% were not interested, had already been clinically diagnosed, or were afraid of insurance consequences. 677 screenees participated, of whom 215 (32%) tested FH positive. Less than 5% of the screenees were critical of the approach and the information provided. 20% of the screenees expressed feelings of social pressure. Effects on mood were minimal to absent, as were general 'quality of life' effects. Conclusions: Screening for FH is highly acceptable to screenees, although social pressure is prevalent. Only a small percentage of people being approached did not participate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-252
Number of pages9
JournalCommunity Genetics
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Familial hypercholesterolaemia
  • Genetic screening
  • Psychological impact
  • Quality of life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How disturbing is it to be approached for a genetic cascade screening programme for familial hypercholesterolaemia? Psychological impact and screenees' views'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this