TY - GEN
T1 - HYDRALAB III
T2 - 9th International Conference on Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters: Adapting to Change
AU - Wolters, Guido
AU - Van Gent, Marcel
AU - Allsop, William
AU - Hamm, Luc
AU - Mühlestein, Doris
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Most established laboratories that perform physical modelling have particular methods for hydraulic model studies. Physical modelling procedures in different laboratories vary in e.g. wave generation techniques; typical storm sequences; wave calibration techniques; scaling of short duration (impulsive) loadings; scaling of permeable materials; monitoring of damage and quantifying small armour movements; overtopping analysis; analysis and verification procedures; factors of safety etc. The potential differences in modelling results are difficult to judge, but may be significant in some cases. Reliable comparison of model test results will only be possible if the test set-up, measurement techniques and modelling approach are verifiably (i.e. geometrically, dynamically and kinematically) similar. This is often not the case, so comparisons between model results from different laboratories and data transfer between laboratories are complicated. This paper presents new guidelines (available for download at http://www.hydralab.eu/) to form a basis for a more unified physical modelling approach, which simplifies data transfer and the interpretation of modelling results gathered by varying laboratories and modelling approaches. To achieve this more unified modelling approach, guidelines for good laboratory practice in physical (experimental) model testing of coastal structures exposed to wave action have been developed.
AB - Most established laboratories that perform physical modelling have particular methods for hydraulic model studies. Physical modelling procedures in different laboratories vary in e.g. wave generation techniques; typical storm sequences; wave calibration techniques; scaling of short duration (impulsive) loadings; scaling of permeable materials; monitoring of damage and quantifying small armour movements; overtopping analysis; analysis and verification procedures; factors of safety etc. The potential differences in modelling results are difficult to judge, but may be significant in some cases. Reliable comparison of model test results will only be possible if the test set-up, measurement techniques and modelling approach are verifiably (i.e. geometrically, dynamically and kinematically) similar. This is often not the case, so comparisons between model results from different laboratories and data transfer between laboratories are complicated. This paper presents new guidelines (available for download at http://www.hydralab.eu/) to form a basis for a more unified physical modelling approach, which simplifies data transfer and the interpretation of modelling results gathered by varying laboratories and modelling approaches. To achieve this more unified modelling approach, guidelines for good laboratory practice in physical (experimental) model testing of coastal structures exposed to wave action have been developed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051515783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259264269_HYDRALAB_III_Guidelines_for_physical_model_testing_of_rubble_mound_breakwaters
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:80051515783
SN - 9780727741318
T3 - Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters: Adapting to Change - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference
SP - 659
EP - 670
BT - Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters
Y2 - 16 September 2009 through 18 September 2009
ER -