TY - JOUR
T1 - "I stood by and watched"
T2 - An autoethnography of stakeholder participation in a living lab
AU - Schrevel, Samuel
AU - Slager, Meralda
AU - Vlugt, Erwin De
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - An emerging and innovative way of organizing projects in health technology and innovation is the so-called "living lab". Because of their characteristics, living labs may provide a solution to a very old problem: How to facilitate the meaningful participation of stakeholders in science and technology? In this article, I (we use a first-person perspective in the paper) aim to contribute to the literature by providing an account of my experiences as a participation researcher with stakeholder participation in a living lab in the Netherlands. I participated in a yearlong project on ensuring freedom for residents in a closed psychogeriatric ward. Using three key moments from that experience, I illustrate why participation was the intention, but was harder to achieve in practice. Participation processes and living labs are situated in specific social and physical contexts. I discuss the "situatedness" of living labs and propose to reconceptualize them as "situated practices": The value of a living lab lies in the processes of work it conducts on specific innovations situated in its local context. A key conclusion is that providing narrative descriptions of living lab projects, with attention to situatedness and stakeholder participation, can provide invaluable examples, insights, and inspirations for other researchers in the field.
AB - An emerging and innovative way of organizing projects in health technology and innovation is the so-called "living lab". Because of their characteristics, living labs may provide a solution to a very old problem: How to facilitate the meaningful participation of stakeholders in science and technology? In this article, I (we use a first-person perspective in the paper) aim to contribute to the literature by providing an account of my experiences as a participation researcher with stakeholder participation in a living lab in the Netherlands. I participated in a yearlong project on ensuring freedom for residents in a closed psychogeriatric ward. Using three key moments from that experience, I illustrate why participation was the intention, but was harder to achieve in practice. Participation processes and living labs are situated in specific social and physical contexts. I discuss the "situatedness" of living labs and propose to reconceptualize them as "situated practices": The value of a living lab lies in the processes of work it conducts on specific innovations situated in its local context. A key conclusion is that providing narrative descriptions of living lab projects, with attention to situatedness and stakeholder participation, can provide invaluable examples, insights, and inspirations for other researchers in the field.
KW - Dementia
KW - Health technology
KW - Living labs
KW - Nursing home
KW - Psychogeriatric care
KW - Situated practice
KW - Stakeholder participation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099061134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1400
DO - 10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1400
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099061134
VL - 10
SP - 19
EP - 30
JO - Technology Innovation Management Review
JF - Technology Innovation Management Review
SN - 1927-0321
IS - 11
ER -