Idea representation and elaboration in design inspiration and fixation experiments

Luis A. Vasconcelos, Maria A. Neroni, Carlos Coimbra Cardoso, Nathan Crilly

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

    7 Citations (Scopus)
    32 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Design fixation experiments often report that participants exposed to an example solution generate fewer ideas than those who were not. This reduced ‘idea fluency’ is generally explained as participants’ creativity being constrained by the example they have seen. However, the inclusion of an example also introduces other factors that might affect idea fluency in the experiments. We here offer an additional explanation for these results: participants not exposed to the example tend to generate ideas with little elaboration, while the level of detail in the example encourages a similar level of elaboration among stimulated participants. Because idea elaboration is time consuming, non-stimulated participants record more ideas overall. We investigated this hypothesis by reanalyzing data from three different studies; in two of them we found that non-stimulated participants generated more ideas and more ideas containing only text, whilst stimulated participants generated ideas that were more elaborated. Based on the creativity literature, we provide several explanations for the differences in results found across studies. Our findings and explanations have implications for the interpretation of creativity experiments reported to date and for the design of future studies
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)93-113
    Number of pages21
    JournalInternational Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
    Volume6
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Keywords

    • Inspiration
    • fixation
    • idea generation
    • visual representation
    • creativity evaluation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Idea representation and elaboration in design inspiration and fixation experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this