TY - JOUR
T1 - In conversation with ghosts
T2 - Towards a hauntological approach to decolonial design for/with AI practices
AU - Patil, Mugdha
AU - Cila, Nazli
AU - Redström, Johan
AU - Giaccardi, Elisa
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This is a critique of how designers deal with temporality in design to speculate about socio-technical futures. The paper unpacks how embedded definitions and assumptions of temporality in current design tools contribute to coloniality in designed futures. Based on this critique, we reject the notion that it is only AI that needs fixing, as design practice becomes implicated in how oppression extends from physical systems to global digital platforms. To make these issues visible, we dissect the Futures Cone model used in speculative design. As an alternative, the paper then presents hauntology as a vocabulary that can aid designers in accommodating pluriversal histories in anticipatory futures and reorienting their speculative tools. To illustrate the benefits of the proposed metaphors, the paper highlights examples of coloniality in digital spaces and emphasizes the failure of speculative design to decolonize future imaginaries. Using points of reference from hauntology, ones that engage with states of lingering or spectrality, and notions of nostalgia, absence, and anticipation, the paper contributes to rethinking the role that design tools play in colonizing future imaginaries, especially those pertaining to potentially disruptive technologies.
AB - This is a critique of how designers deal with temporality in design to speculate about socio-technical futures. The paper unpacks how embedded definitions and assumptions of temporality in current design tools contribute to coloniality in designed futures. Based on this critique, we reject the notion that it is only AI that needs fixing, as design practice becomes implicated in how oppression extends from physical systems to global digital platforms. To make these issues visible, we dissect the Futures Cone model used in speculative design. As an alternative, the paper then presents hauntology as a vocabulary that can aid designers in accommodating pluriversal histories in anticipatory futures and reorienting their speculative tools. To illustrate the benefits of the proposed metaphors, the paper highlights examples of coloniality in digital spaces and emphasizes the failure of speculative design to decolonize future imaginaries. Using points of reference from hauntology, ones that engage with states of lingering or spectrality, and notions of nostalgia, absence, and anticipation, the paper contributes to rethinking the role that design tools play in colonizing future imaginaries, especially those pertaining to potentially disruptive technologies.
KW - AI
KW - Decoloniality
KW - Hauntology
KW - Socio-technological imaginaries
KW - Temporality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203963019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15710882.2024.2320269
DO - 10.1080/15710882.2024.2320269
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203963019
SN - 1571-0882
VL - 20
SP - 55
EP - 76
JO - CoDesign
JF - CoDesign
IS - 1
ER -