In rDNS We Trust: Revisiting a Common Data-Source’s Reliability

Tobias Fiebig, Kevin Borgolte, Shuang Hao, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna, Anja Feldmann

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reverse DNS (rDNS) is regularly used as a data source in Internet measurement research. However, existing work is polarized on its reliability, and new techniques to collect active IPv6 datasets have not yet been sufficiently evaluated. In this paper, we investigate active and passive data collection and practical use aspects of rDNS datasets.We observe that the share of non-authoritatively answerable IPv4 rDNS queries reduced since earlier studies and IPv6 rDNS has less non-authoritatively answerable queries than IPv4 rDNS. Furthermore, we compare passively collected datasets with actively collected ones, and we show that they enable observing the same effects in rDNS data. While highlighting opportunities for future research, we find no immediate challenges to the use of rDNS as active and passive data-source for Internet measurement research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement
EditorsRobert Beverly, Georgios Smaragdakis, Anja Feldmann
PublisherSpringer
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-76480-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventInternational Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement - Berlin, Germany
Duration: 26 Mar 201827 Mar 2018

Publication series

Name Lecture Notes in Computer Science
PublisherSpringer
Volume10771
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
NameComputer Communication Networks and Telecommunications
PublisherSpringer
Volume10771

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement
Abbreviated titlePAM 2018
CountryGermany
CityBerlin
Period26/03/1827/03/18

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In rDNS We Trust: Revisiting a Common Data-Source’s Reliability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this