Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

Marjolein de Best-Waldhober, Dancker Daamen, Andrea Ramirez Ramirez, André Faaij, Chris Hendriks, Erika de Visser

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleScientificpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, an Information-Choice Questionnaire (ICQ) was used to find out how a representative sample of the Dutch public (n =971) would evaluate and choose between seven mitigation options after having been thoroughly informed. The results suggest that due to the comparison with other mitigation options, people are less positive about CCS options. Still, only few respondents firmly reject the CCS options.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4795-4802
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-9 - Washington DC, United States
Duration: 16 Nov 200820 Nov 2008

Keywords

  • acceptance
  • CCS
  • Choice
  • ICQ
  • Information
  • Public opinion
  • Public perception

Cite this