Abstract
Congestion control algorithms are crucial in achieving high utilization while preventing overloading the network. Over the years, many different congestion control algorithms have been developed, each trying to improve over others in
specific situations. However, their interactions and co-existence has, to date, not been thoroughly evaluated, which is the focus of this paper. Through head-to-head comparisons of loss-based, delay-based and hybrid types of congestion control algorithms, we reveal that fairness in resources claimed is often not achieved,
especially when flows sharing a link have different round-trip times or belong to different groups.
specific situations. However, their interactions and co-existence has, to date, not been thoroughly evaluated, which is the focus of this paper. Through head-to-head comparisons of loss-based, delay-based and hybrid types of congestion control algorithms, we reveal that fairness in resources claimed is often not achieved,
especially when flows sharing a link have different round-trip times or belong to different groups.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 2019 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA) |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 3rd Network Trac Measurement and Analysis Conference |
Editors | S. Secci, I. Chrisment, M. Fiore, L. Tabourier, K.W. Lim |
Publisher | IEEE |
Pages | 161-168 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-903176-17-1 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-5386-7372-0 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Event | TMA 2019: 3rd Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference - Paris, France Duration: 19 Jun 2019 → 21 Jun 2019 Conference number: 3 https://tma.roc.cnam.fr/ |
Conference
Conference | TMA 2019: 3rd Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | TMA 2019 |
Country/Territory | France |
City | Paris |
Period | 19/06/19 → 21/06/19 |
Internet address |