TY - JOUR
T1 - Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Antarctic Boundary Layer for Very Stable Stratification
AU - Couvreux, Fleur
AU - Bazile, Eric
AU - Rodier, Quentin
AU - Maronga, Björn
AU - Matheou, Georgios
AU - Chinita, Maria J.
AU - Edwards, John
AU - van Stratum, Bart J.H.
AU - van Heerwaarden, Chiel C.
AU - Huang, Jing
AU - Moene, Arnold F.
AU - Cheng, Anning
AU - Fuka, Vladimir
AU - Basu, Sukanta
AU - Bou-Zeid, Elie
AU - Canut, Guylaine
AU - Vignon, Etienne
N1 - Accepted Author Manuscript
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In polar regions, where the boundary layer is often stably stratified, atmospheric models produce large biases depending on the boundary-layer parametrizations and the parametrization of the exchange of energy at the surface. This model intercomparison focuses on the very stable stratification encountered over the Antarctic Plateau in 2009. Here, we analyze results from 10 large-eddy-simulation (LES) codes for different spatial resolutions over 24 consecutive hours, and compare them with observations acquired at the Concordia Research Station during summer. This is a challenging exercise for such simulations since they need to reproduce both the 300-m-deep convective boundary layer and the very thin stable boundary layer characterized by a strong vertical temperature gradient (10 K difference over the lowest 20 m) when the sun is low over the horizon. A large variability in surface fluxes among the different models is highlighted. The LES models correctly reproduce the convective boundary layer in terms of mean profiles and turbulent characteristics but display more spread during stable conditions, which is largely reduced by increasing the horizontal and vertical resolutions in additional simulations focusing only on the stable period. This highlights the fact that very fine resolution is needed to represent such conditions. Complementary sensitivity studies are conducted regarding the roughness length, the subgrid-scale turbulence closure as well as the resolution and domain size. While we find little dependence on the surface-flux parametrization, the results indicate a pronounced sensitivity to both the roughness length and the turbulence closure.
AB - In polar regions, where the boundary layer is often stably stratified, atmospheric models produce large biases depending on the boundary-layer parametrizations and the parametrization of the exchange of energy at the surface. This model intercomparison focuses on the very stable stratification encountered over the Antarctic Plateau in 2009. Here, we analyze results from 10 large-eddy-simulation (LES) codes for different spatial resolutions over 24 consecutive hours, and compare them with observations acquired at the Concordia Research Station during summer. This is a challenging exercise for such simulations since they need to reproduce both the 300-m-deep convective boundary layer and the very thin stable boundary layer characterized by a strong vertical temperature gradient (10 K difference over the lowest 20 m) when the sun is low over the horizon. A large variability in surface fluxes among the different models is highlighted. The LES models correctly reproduce the convective boundary layer in terms of mean profiles and turbulent characteristics but display more spread during stable conditions, which is largely reduced by increasing the horizontal and vertical resolutions in additional simulations focusing only on the stable period. This highlights the fact that very fine resolution is needed to represent such conditions. Complementary sensitivity studies are conducted regarding the roughness length, the subgrid-scale turbulence closure as well as the resolution and domain size. While we find little dependence on the surface-flux parametrization, the results indicate a pronounced sensitivity to both the roughness length and the turbulence closure.
KW - Antarctica
KW - Dome C
KW - Large-eddy simulation
KW - Parametrization
KW - Stable boundary layer
KW - Subgrid turbulence parametrization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087033990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10546-020-00539-4
DO - 10.1007/s10546-020-00539-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087033990
SN - 0006-8314
VL - 176
SP - 369
EP - 400
JO - Boundary-Layer Meteorology
JF - Boundary-Layer Meteorology
IS - 3
ER -