Intercomparison of NOx emission inventories over East Asia

Jieying Ding, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Ronald Johannes Van Der A, Bas Mijling, Jun Ichi Kurokawa, Seog Yeon Cho, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Qiang Zhang, Fei Liu, Pieternel Felicitas Levelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)
51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We compare nine emission inventories of nitrogen oxides including four satellite-derived NOx inventories and the following bottom-up inventories for East Asia: REAS (Regional Emission inventory in ASia), MEIC (Multiresolution Emission Inventory for China), CAPSS (Clean Air Policy Support System) and EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research). Two of the satellitederived inventories are estimated by using the DECSO (Daily Emission derived Constrained by Satellite Observations) algorithm, which is based on an extended Kalman filter applied to observations from OMI or from GOME-2. The other two are derived with the EnKF algorithm, which is based on an ensemble Kalman filter applied to observations of multiple species using either the chemical transport model CHASER and MIROC-chem. The temporal behaviour and spatial distribution of the inventories are compared on a national and regional scale. A distinction is also made between urban and rural areas. The intercomparison of all inventories shows good agreement in total NOx emissions over mainland China, especially for trends, with an average bias of about 20% for yearly emissions. All the inventories show the typical emission reduction of 10% during the Chinese New Year and a peak in December. Satellite-derived approaches using OMI show a summer peak due to strong emissions from soil and biomass burning in this season. Biases in NOx emissions and uncertainties in temporal variability increase quickly when the spatial scale decreases. The analyses of the differences show the importance of using observations from multiple instruments and a high spatial resolution model for the satellite-derived inventories, while for bottom-up inventories, accurate emission factors and activity information are required. The advantage of the satellite-derived approach is that the emissions are soon available after observation, while the strength of the bottom-up inventories is that they include detailed information of emissions for each source category.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10125-10141
Number of pages17
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics (online)
Volume17
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intercomparison of NO<sub>x</sub> emission inventories over East Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this