International comparison of variation in performance between hospitals for THA and TKA: Is it even possible? A systematic review including 33 studies and 8 arthroplasty register reports

Peter van Schie©*, Shaho Hasan, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Jan W. Schoones, Rob G.H.H. Nelissen, Perla J. Marang- van de Mheen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to improve care for total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA), hospitals may want to compare their performance with hospitals in other countries. Pooling data across countries also enable early detection of infrequently occurring safety issues. We therefore aimed to assess the between-hospital variation and definitions used for revision, readmission, and complications across countries. • PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Emcare, and Academic Search Premier were searched from January 2009 to August 2020 for studies reporting on: (i) primary THA/ TKA; (ii) revision, readmission, or complications; and (iii) between-hospital variation. Most recent registry reports of Network of Orthopedic Registries of Europe members were also reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Integrated quality Criteria for the Review Of Multiple Study designs tool for studies and relevant domains for registries. We assessed agreement for the following domains: (i) outcome definition; (ii) follow-up and starting point; (iii) case-mix adjustment; and (iv) type of patients and hospitals included. • Between-hospital variation was reported in 33 (1 high-quality, 13 moderate-quality, and 19 low-quality) studies and 8 registry reports. The range of variation for revision was 0-33% for THA and 0-27% for TKA varying between assessment within hospital admission until 10 years of follow-up; for readmission, 0-40% and 0-32% for THA and TKA, respectively; and for complications, 0-75% and 0-50% for THA and TKA, respectively. Indicator definitions and methodological variables varied considerably across domains. • The large heterogeneity in definitions and methods used likely explains the considerable variation in between-hospital variation reported for revision, readmission, and complications, making it impossible to benchmark hospitals across countries or pool data for earlier detection of safety issues. It is necessary to collaborate internationally and strive for more uniformity in indicator definitions and methods in order to achieve reliable international benchmarking in the future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-263
Number of pages17
JournalEFORT Open Reviews
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • between-hospital variation
  • complications
  • performance indicators
  • readmission
  • revision
  • systematic review
  • total hip arthroplasty
  • total knee arthroplasty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International comparison of variation in performance between hospitals for THA and TKA: Is it even possible? A systematic review including 33 studies and 8 arthroplasty register reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this