TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating the conservatism-disgust paradox in reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - A reexamination of the interrelations among political ideology, disgust sensitivity, and pandemic response
AU - Ruisch, Benjamin C.
AU - Boggs, Shelby T.
AU - Moore , Courtney A.
AU - Granados Samayoa, Javier A.
AU - Ladanyi, Jesse T.
AU - Steinert, S.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Research has documented robust associations between greater disgust sensitivity and (1) concerns about disease, and (2) political conservatism. However, the COVID-19 disease pandemic raised challenging questions about these associations. In particular, why have conservatives—despite their greater disgust sensitivity—exhibited less concern about the pandemic? Here, we investigate this “conservatism-disgust paradox” and address several outstanding theoretical questions regarding the interrelations among disgust sensitivity, ideology, and pandemic response. In four studies (N = 1,764), we identify several methodological and conceptual factors—in particular, an overreliance on self-report measures—that may have inflated the apparent associations among these constructs. Using non-self-report measures, we find evidence that disgust sensitivity may be a less potent predictor of disease avoidance than is typically assumed, and that ideological differences in disgust sensitivity may be amplified by self-report measures. These findings suggest that the true pattern of interrelations among these factors may be less “paradoxical” than is typically believed.
AB - Research has documented robust associations between greater disgust sensitivity and (1) concerns about disease, and (2) political conservatism. However, the COVID-19 disease pandemic raised challenging questions about these associations. In particular, why have conservatives—despite their greater disgust sensitivity—exhibited less concern about the pandemic? Here, we investigate this “conservatism-disgust paradox” and address several outstanding theoretical questions regarding the interrelations among disgust sensitivity, ideology, and pandemic response. In four studies (N = 1,764), we identify several methodological and conceptual factors—in particular, an overreliance on self-report measures—that may have inflated the apparent associations among these constructs. Using non-self-report measures, we find evidence that disgust sensitivity may be a less potent predictor of disease avoidance than is typically assumed, and that ideological differences in disgust sensitivity may be amplified by self-report measures. These findings suggest that the true pattern of interrelations among these factors may be less “paradoxical” than is typically believed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141491191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0275440
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0275440
M3 - Article
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 24
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 11
M1 - e0275440
ER -