Is the take-over paradigm a mere convenience?

Joost de Winter*, Neville Stanton, Yke Bauke Eisma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The last decade has seen a surge of driving simulator research on automation-to-manual take-overs. In this commentary, we argue that most research within the take-over paradigm bears little resemblance to real automated driving. Furthermore, we claim that results within this paradigm could already be known based on published research from the previous century. It is concluded that take-over studies have characteristics of a self-sustaining convenience. We end with recommendations for out-of-the-box take-over research that may contribute to the development of safer automated vehicles.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100370
Number of pages5
JournalTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Automated driving
  • Brake response time
  • Operational design domain
  • Take-over

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the take-over paradigm a mere convenience?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this