Is Wikipedia succeeding in reducing gender bias? Assessing changes in gender bias in Wikipedia using word embeddings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeConference contributionScientificpeer-review

440 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Large text corpora used for creating word embeddings (vectors which represent word meanings) often contain stereotypical gender biases. As a result, such unwanted biases will typically also be present in word embeddings derived from such corpora and downstream applications in the field of natural language processing (NLP). To minimize the effect of gender bias in these settings, more insight is needed when it comes to where and how biases manifest themselves in the text corpora employed. This paper contributes by showing how gender bias in word embeddings from Wikipedia has developed over time. Quantifying the gender bias over time shows that art related words have become more female biased. Family and science words have stereotypical biases towards respectively female and male words. These biases seem to have decreased since 2006, but these changes are not more extreme than those seen in random sets of words. Career related words are more strongly associated with male than with female, this difference has only become smaller in recently written articles. These developments provide additional understanding of what can be done to make Wikipedia more gender neutral and how important time of writing can be when considering biases in word embeddings trained from Wikipedia or from other text corpora.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science
Place of PublicationOnline
PublisherAssociation for Computational Linguistics
Pages94-103
Number of pages10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Wikipedia succeeding in reducing gender bias? Assessing changes in gender bias in Wikipedia using word embeddings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this