Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Issues of quality: what is good policy analysis and how do we know?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Relatively little research has been done on the topic of evaluating policy analytic activities. This chapter presents the results of an exploration of the issue carried out in support of policy analysis research, and based on publications from the field of policy analysis and some related fields. It appeared that a large variety exists regarding evaluation concepts and criteria. Although the establishment of a single set of generally applicable criteria is not feasible, a conceptual structure for identifying and categorizing criteria to evaluate policy analytic activities is proposed in this chapter. The elaborated structure and constructed list of criteria provides a basis from which researchers can, in individual cases, make a selection depending on the context and objectives of their research and those of the policy analytic effort being evaluated. The list of criteria provides a helping hand to evaluate and, in the end, improve policy analytic activities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Policy Advice
EditorsM. Howlett, I. Mukherjee
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages101-135
Number of pages35
ISBN (Electronic)9781035318087
ISBN (Print)9781035318070
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Evaluation criteria
  • Meta-analysis
  • Policy analytic activities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Issues of quality: what is good policy analysis and how do we know?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this