TY - JOUR
T1 - Large Eddy Simulation of CO2 diluted oxy-fuel spray flames
AU - Ma, Likun
AU - Huang, Xu
AU - Roekaerts, Dirk
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - We report results of a computational study of oxy-fuel spray jet flames. An experimental database on flames of ethanol burning in a coflow of a O2–CO2 mixture, created at CORIA (Rouen, France), is used for model validation (Cléon et al., 2015). Depending on the coflow composition and velocity the flames in these experiments start at nozzle (type A), just above the tip of the liquid sheet (type B) or are lifted (type C) and the challenge is to predict their structure and the transitions between them. The two-phase flow field is solved with an Eulerian–Lagrangian approach, with gas phase turbulence solved by Large Eddy Simulation (LES). The turbulence-chemistry interaction is accounted for using the Flamelet Generated Manifolds (FGM) method. The primary breakup process of the liquid fuel is neglected in the current study; instead droplets are directly injected at the location of the atomizer exit at the boundary of the simulation domain. It is found that for the type C flame, which is stabilized far downstream the dense region, some major features are successfully captured, e.g. the gas phase velocity field and flame structure. The flame lift-off height of type B flame is over-predicted. The type A flame, where the flame stabilizes inside the liquid sheet, cannot be described well by the current simulation model. A detailed analysis of the droplet properties along Lagrangian tracks has been carried out in order to explain the predicted flame structure and discuss the agreement with experiment. This analysis shows that differences in predicted flame structure are well-explained by the combined effects of droplet heating, dispersion and evaporation as function of droplet size. It is concluded that a possible reason for the difficulty to predict the type A and B flames is that strong atomization-combustion interaction exists in these flames, modifying the droplet formation process. This suggests that atomization-combustion interaction should be taken into account in future study of these flame types.
AB - We report results of a computational study of oxy-fuel spray jet flames. An experimental database on flames of ethanol burning in a coflow of a O2–CO2 mixture, created at CORIA (Rouen, France), is used for model validation (Cléon et al., 2015). Depending on the coflow composition and velocity the flames in these experiments start at nozzle (type A), just above the tip of the liquid sheet (type B) or are lifted (type C) and the challenge is to predict their structure and the transitions between them. The two-phase flow field is solved with an Eulerian–Lagrangian approach, with gas phase turbulence solved by Large Eddy Simulation (LES). The turbulence-chemistry interaction is accounted for using the Flamelet Generated Manifolds (FGM) method. The primary breakup process of the liquid fuel is neglected in the current study; instead droplets are directly injected at the location of the atomizer exit at the boundary of the simulation domain. It is found that for the type C flame, which is stabilized far downstream the dense region, some major features are successfully captured, e.g. the gas phase velocity field and flame structure. The flame lift-off height of type B flame is over-predicted. The type A flame, where the flame stabilizes inside the liquid sheet, cannot be described well by the current simulation model. A detailed analysis of the droplet properties along Lagrangian tracks has been carried out in order to explain the predicted flame structure and discuss the agreement with experiment. This analysis shows that differences in predicted flame structure are well-explained by the combined effects of droplet heating, dispersion and evaporation as function of droplet size. It is concluded that a possible reason for the difficulty to predict the type A and B flames is that strong atomization-combustion interaction exists in these flames, modifying the droplet formation process. This suggests that atomization-combustion interaction should be taken into account in future study of these flame types.
KW - Oxy-fuel combustion
KW - Spray combustion
KW - Large Eddy Simulation
KW - Flamelet Generated Manifolds
KW - Double flame
UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:068a1ba5-671d-441b-83b5-b7eca9a78040
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.050
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.050
M3 - Article
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 201
SP - 165
EP - 175
JO - Fuel: the science and technology of fuel and energy
JF - Fuel: the science and technology of fuel and energy
ER -