Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Literature review papers: the search and selection process

  • Bert van Wee*
  • , David Banister
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

    21   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)
    804 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In an earlier publication (Van Wee & Banister, 2016), we explained that literature review papers (LRP) should explicitly report on the search and selection process of documents included. In this paper, we present two approaches for reporting the methodology for doing this: a basic approach and a reasoned approach. The basic approach includes reporting databases(s), keywords, search strings, snowballing, the selection of documents, presenting an overview of documents included and reporting additional selection criteria (if applicable). The reasoned approach adds to the basic approach (what was done) by explicitly explaining the motivation for choices and showing the selection process graphically (why it was done). The two approaches should be seen as options, and not the only alternatives. We recommend that authors of LRPs depart from these approaches and modify them where appropriate. The important lesson is that authors should be explicit about the approach adopted, as this enables the reader to understand the thinking behind the LRP and the conclusions drawn.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)559-565
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Decision Systems
    Volume33
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Keywords

    • basic and reasoned approaches
    • Literature review
    • methodology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Literature review papers: the search and selection process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this