Abstract
In Marchenko redatuming, sources and receivers are moved from the acquisition surface to a new datum plane in the subsurface, thereby accounting for internal multiple reflections in the overburden. After estimating focusing functions from the reflection data at the surface, the sources are focused onto virtual sources at the new datum. Next, the receivers can be redatumed, either by multidimensional deconvolution (MDD) or by applying a second focusing step. From a theoretical point of view MDD is preferred over focusing, but the practical implementation is challenging and computationally expensive. When accurate redatumed data are required, applying MDD may be worth the effort, but when redatuming is combined with imaging at all depth levels of interest, the more straightforward focusing approach is preferred.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
| Event | 86th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition 2025 - Toulouse, France Duration: 2 Jun 2025 → 5 Jun 2025 https://eageannual.org/eage-annual-2025/ |
Conference
| Conference | 86th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition 2025 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | EAGE 2025 |
| Country/Territory | France |
| City | Toulouse |
| Period | 2/06/25 → 5/06/25 |
| Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl.Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Marchenko redatuming by MDD and by double focusing: a systematic comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver