MinMax fairness: from Rawlsian Theory of Justice to solution for algorithmic bias

Flavia Barsotti*, Rüya Gökhan Koçer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper presents an intuitive explanation about why and how Rawlsian Theory of Justice (Rawls in A theory of justice, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1971) provides the foundations to a solution for algorithmic bias. The contribution of the paper is to discuss and show why Rawlsian ideas in their original form (e.g. the veil of ignorance, original position, and allowing inequalities that serve the worst-off) are relevant to operationalize fairness for algorithmic decision making. The paper also explains how this leads to a specific MinMaxfairness solution, which addresses the basic challenges of algorithmic justice. We combine substantive elements of Rawlsian perspective with an intuitive explanation in order to provide accessible and practical insights. The goal is to propose and motivate why and how the MinMaxfairness solution derived from Rawlsian principles overcomes some of the current challenges for algorithmic bias and highlight the benefits provided when compared to other approaches. The paper presents and discusses the solution by building a bridge between the qualitative theoretical aspects and the quantitative technical approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)961-974
Number of pages14
JournalAI and Society
Volume39 (2024)
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • AI systems
  • Algorithmic bias
  • Ethics
  • Fairness
  • Rawlsian Justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MinMax fairness: from Rawlsian Theory of Justice to solution for algorithmic bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this