Multi-hazard probabilistic safety assessments using Bayesian networks – A framework and demonstration for integrating technical and human risk

Varenya Kumar D. Mohan*, Pieter H.A.J.M. van Gelder, Pierre Gehl, Michael A. Hicks, Philip J. Vardon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the advantages of using Bayesian networks for probabilistic risk assessment, adoption in practice has been limited due to the lack of realistic, facility-scale studies. Scaling up from systems to facility-level safety assessments poses challenges in (i) integrating external hazards and their cascading effects, and (ii) resolving non-homogeneity of various technical and human reliability models. The novelty of the study is in formalising risk integration using Bayesian networks, at facility scale, and demonstrating its effectiveness in addressing associated challenges. A Bayesian network-based multi-hazard risk framework is introduced and demonstrated for a nuclear power plant subject to flooding and earthquake hazards, capturing dependencies among hazards and consequences. Individual reliability models – conventionally extraneous to facility-wide risk models – are included as subnetworks by using Bayesian network-based surrogate models for technical systems and a Bayesian networks approach for human reliability modelling. Two approaches are used for subnetwork integration – object-oriented and unified Bayesian networks. The unified approach allows for prediction, diagnostics and inter-causal reasoning since Bayesian inference is bi-directional. Conversely, in the object-oriented approach, diagnostics are limited to within individual subnetworks and as a consequence the model can potentially neglect dependencies between objects. However, the object-oriented model requires only 50 % of the computational memory and consumes less than 25% of the runtime as the unified network, while improving visual clarity of the risk model. The model reveals key insights – for example, variations in operator stress or available response time during a hazard event can result in up to a 77 % change in top event probability – demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing critical relationships in complex, facility-scale risk scenarios. These findings can be used to suitably allocate resources towards risk mitigation and plant safety management.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114558
JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
Volume446
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • Bayesian network
  • Fault tree
  • Human reliability
  • Multi-hazard
  • PSA
  • Risk assessment
  • Safety assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-hazard probabilistic safety assessments using Bayesian networks – A framework and demonstration for integrating technical and human risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this