TY - JOUR
T1 - Muscular responses to upper body mediolateral angular momentum perturbations during overground walking
AU - Mohseni, Omid
AU - Berry, Andrew
AU - Schumacher, Christian
AU - Seyfarth, Andre
AU - Vallery, Heike
AU - Sharbafi, Maziar A.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Adaptive motor control and seamless coordination of muscle actions in response to external perturbations are crucial to maintaining balance during bipedal locomotion. There is an ongoing debate about the specific roles of individual muscles and underlying neural control circuitry that humans employ to maintain balance in different perturbation scenarios. To advance our understanding of human motor control in perturbation recovery, we conducted a study using a portable Angular Momentum Perturbator (AMP). Unlike other push/pull perturbation systems, the AMP can generate perturbation torques on the upper body while minimizing the perturbing forces at the center of mass. In this study, ten participants experienced trunk perturbations during either the mid-stance or touchdown phase in two frontal plane directions (ipsilateral and contralateral). We recorded and analyzed the electromyography (EMG) activity of eight lower-limb muscles from both legs to examine muscular responses in different phases and directions. Based on our findings, individuals primarily employ long-latency hip strategies to effectively counteract perturbation torques, with the occasional use of ankle strategies. Furthermore, it was found that proximal muscles, particularly the biarticular Rectus Femoris, consistently exhibited higher activation levels than other muscles. Additionally, in instances where a statistically significant difference was noted, we observed that the fastest reactions generally stem from muscles in close proximity to the perturbation site. However, the temporal sequence of muscles’ activation depends on the timing and direction of the perturbation. These findings enhance reflex response modeling, aiding the development of simulation tools for accurately predicting exogenous disturbances. Additionally, they hold the potential to shape the development of assistive devices, with implications for clinical interventions, particularly for the elderly.
AB - Adaptive motor control and seamless coordination of muscle actions in response to external perturbations are crucial to maintaining balance during bipedal locomotion. There is an ongoing debate about the specific roles of individual muscles and underlying neural control circuitry that humans employ to maintain balance in different perturbation scenarios. To advance our understanding of human motor control in perturbation recovery, we conducted a study using a portable Angular Momentum Perturbator (AMP). Unlike other push/pull perturbation systems, the AMP can generate perturbation torques on the upper body while minimizing the perturbing forces at the center of mass. In this study, ten participants experienced trunk perturbations during either the mid-stance or touchdown phase in two frontal plane directions (ipsilateral and contralateral). We recorded and analyzed the electromyography (EMG) activity of eight lower-limb muscles from both legs to examine muscular responses in different phases and directions. Based on our findings, individuals primarily employ long-latency hip strategies to effectively counteract perturbation torques, with the occasional use of ankle strategies. Furthermore, it was found that proximal muscles, particularly the biarticular Rectus Femoris, consistently exhibited higher activation levels than other muscles. Additionally, in instances where a statistically significant difference was noted, we observed that the fastest reactions generally stem from muscles in close proximity to the perturbation site. However, the temporal sequence of muscles’ activation depends on the timing and direction of the perturbation. These findings enhance reflex response modeling, aiding the development of simulation tools for accurately predicting exogenous disturbances. Additionally, they hold the potential to shape the development of assistive devices, with implications for clinical interventions, particularly for the elderly.
KW - balance control
KW - control moment gyroscope
KW - perturbation-invoked muscle activity
KW - perturbed walking
KW - postural adjustments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003689523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1509090
DO - 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1509090
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003689523
SN - 2296-4185
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
JF - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
M1 - 1509090
ER -