Online manipulation: Charting the field

Fleur Jongepier, M.B.O.T. Klenk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeChapterScientific

6 Citations (Scopus)
57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the key debates and concepts relevant to online manipulation. First, it introduces and critically discusses three preliminary methodological questions concerning the method used to study manipulation (online), the normative charge of the concept, and the level and type of intentionality required to manipulate. Second, it critically discusses the most prominent philosophical approaches to the study of manipulation, distinguishing process-, outcome- and norm-based views of manipulation. Third, it introduces the notion of an “aggravating factor”, which is a factor that can make online manipulation more effective, its effects worse or morally wrong, or makes it harder for individuals to avoid or contest manipulative practices and technologies. Under this header, we will discuss personalization, opacity, flow, lack of user control, and an organization’s moral compass.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Philosophy of Online Manipulation
EditorsFleur Jongepier, Michael Klenk
PublisherRoutledge - Taylor & Francis Group
Chapter2
Pages15-48
Number of pages34
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-003-20542-5
ISBN (Print)978-1-032-03001-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research in Applied Ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Online manipulation: Charting the field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this