(Online) manipulation: sometimes hidden, always careless

Michael Klenk*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
102 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ever-increasing numbers of human interactions with intelligent software agents, online and offline, and their increasing ability to influence humans have prompted a surge in attention toward the concept of (online) manipulation. Several scholars have argued that manipulative influence is always hidden. But manipulation is sometimes overt, and when this is acknowledged the distinction between manipulation and other forms of social influence becomes problematic. Therefore, we need a better conceptualisation of manipulation that allows it to be overt and yet clearly distinct from related concepts of social influence. I argue that manipulation is careless influence, show how this account helps to alleviate the shortcomings of the hidden influence view of manipulation, and derive implications for digital ethics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-105
Number of pages21
JournalReview of Social Economy
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • autonomy
  • digital ethics
  • Manipulation
  • social expectations
  • social influence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '(Online) manipulation: sometimes hidden, always careless'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this