TY - JOUR
T1 - Personal and related kinds of proximity driving collaborations
T2 - a multi-case study of Dutch nanotechnology researchers
AU - Werker, Claudia
AU - Ooms, Ward
AU - Caniëls, Marjolein C J
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Previous studies investigating proximity and collaboration have not clarified personal elements, such as working or communication style. Here, we show that personal proximity—close similarity in terms of personal traits and behavioral patterns—substantially affects the whole life cycle of research collaborations. We conduct a multi-case study of Dutch nanotechnology researchers. We select our interviewees through a bibliometric analysis and focus on the most central Dutch nanotechnology researchers in the global network. Our results reveal that social proximity and temporary geographical proximity have indirect effects enabling potential partners to assess their personal proximity. Sufficient levels of personal proximity often make or break the deal, provided that partners’ cognitive and organizational proximity—which are major drivers of research collaborations—suffice. Introducing personal proximity to analyze research collaborations puts previous findings on proximity dimensions’ effect on collaboration in a new perspective.
AB - Previous studies investigating proximity and collaboration have not clarified personal elements, such as working or communication style. Here, we show that personal proximity—close similarity in terms of personal traits and behavioral patterns—substantially affects the whole life cycle of research collaborations. We conduct a multi-case study of Dutch nanotechnology researchers. We select our interviewees through a bibliometric analysis and focus on the most central Dutch nanotechnology researchers in the global network. Our results reveal that social proximity and temporary geographical proximity have indirect effects enabling potential partners to assess their personal proximity. Sufficient levels of personal proximity often make or break the deal, provided that partners’ cognitive and organizational proximity—which are major drivers of research collaborations—suffice. Introducing personal proximity to analyze research collaborations puts previous findings on proximity dimensions’ effect on collaboration in a new perspective.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990913692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:80f2ffc0-4f21-456f-bf46-1d74b678b6f8
U2 - 10.1186/s40064-016-3445-1
DO - 10.1186/s40064-016-3445-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84990913692
SN - 2193-1801
VL - 5
JO - SpringerPlus
JF - SpringerPlus
IS - 1
M1 - 1751
ER -