Postdiction of the Flexural Shear Capacity of a Deep Beam Without Stirrups Using NLFEM

Yuguang Yang; Ane de Boer; Joop den Uijl

doi:10.1080/10168664.2021.1894631

Postdiction of the Flexural Shear Capacity of a Deep Beam Without Stirrups Using NLFEM

Yuguang Yang^*, Ane de Boer, Joop den Uijl

^*Corresponding author for this work

Concrete Structures

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A recent contest of shear tests modelling was carried out in 2019. Teams from universities and consultancies around Europe were invited to predict the shear capacity of two reinforced concrete beams. The basics of the numerical models were to be set up according the Dutch NLFEM Guideline RTD 1016–1:2017. In the contest, two reinforced concrete beams without stirrups but having large depth (1200 mm), tested at Delft University of Technology, were selected as the modelling target. Most participants in the contest did not obtain good agreement with the test results. This paper presents a postdiction study on one of the two tests: H123. Based on this study, some adaptations are made to the recommendations of RTD 1016–1:2017 in order to approach the test results better. The intention of this contribution is to improve the existing NLFEA Guideline for practical engineering structures with uncommon reinforcement layouts.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	208-215
Number of pages	9
Journal	Structural Engineering International
Volume	31
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2021.1894631
Publication status	Published - 2021

Bibliographical note

Accepted Author Manuscript

Keywords

deep beam
NLFEA
reinforced concrete
shear failure
without shear reinforcement

Access to Document

10.1080/10168664.2021.1894631

Post-diction paper without changes marked_03 finalAccepted author manuscript, 1.09 MB

Cite this

@article{250f791ff28c45a7b4f22694d74e91d8,

title = "Postdiction of the Flexural Shear Capacity of a Deep Beam Without Stirrups Using NLFEM",

abstract = "A recent contest of shear tests modelling was carried out in 2019. Teams from universities and consultancies around Europe were invited to predict the shear capacity of two reinforced concrete beams. The basics of the numerical models were to be set up according the Dutch NLFEM Guideline RTD 1016–1:2017. In the contest, two reinforced concrete beams without stirrups but having large depth (1200 mm), tested at Delft University of Technology, were selected as the modelling target. Most participants in the contest did not obtain good agreement with the test results. This paper presents a postdiction study on one of the two tests: H123. Based on this study, some adaptations are made to the recommendations of RTD 1016–1:2017 in order to approach the test results better. The intention of this contribution is to improve the existing NLFEA Guideline for practical engineering structures with uncommon reinforcement layouts.",

keywords = "deep beam, NLFEA, reinforced concrete, shear failure, without shear reinforcement",

author = "Yuguang Yang and {de Boer}, Ane and {den Uijl}, Joop",

note = "Accepted Author Manuscript",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1080/10168664.2021.1894631",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "208--215",

journal = "Structural Engineering International",

issn = "1016-8664",

publisher = "Int. Assoc. for Bridge and Structural Eng. Eth-Honggerberg",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postdiction of the Flexural Shear Capacity of a Deep Beam Without Stirrups Using NLFEM

AU - Yang, Yuguang

AU - de Boer, Ane

AU - den Uijl, Joop

N1 - Accepted Author Manuscript

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - A recent contest of shear tests modelling was carried out in 2019. Teams from universities and consultancies around Europe were invited to predict the shear capacity of two reinforced concrete beams. The basics of the numerical models were to be set up according the Dutch NLFEM Guideline RTD 1016–1:2017. In the contest, two reinforced concrete beams without stirrups but having large depth (1200 mm), tested at Delft University of Technology, were selected as the modelling target. Most participants in the contest did not obtain good agreement with the test results. This paper presents a postdiction study on one of the two tests: H123. Based on this study, some adaptations are made to the recommendations of RTD 1016–1:2017 in order to approach the test results better. The intention of this contribution is to improve the existing NLFEA Guideline for practical engineering structures with uncommon reinforcement layouts.

AB - A recent contest of shear tests modelling was carried out in 2019. Teams from universities and consultancies around Europe were invited to predict the shear capacity of two reinforced concrete beams. The basics of the numerical models were to be set up according the Dutch NLFEM Guideline RTD 1016–1:2017. In the contest, two reinforced concrete beams without stirrups but having large depth (1200 mm), tested at Delft University of Technology, were selected as the modelling target. Most participants in the contest did not obtain good agreement with the test results. This paper presents a postdiction study on one of the two tests: H123. Based on this study, some adaptations are made to the recommendations of RTD 1016–1:2017 in order to approach the test results better. The intention of this contribution is to improve the existing NLFEA Guideline for practical engineering structures with uncommon reinforcement layouts.

KW - deep beam

KW - NLFEA

KW - reinforced concrete

KW - shear failure

KW - without shear reinforcement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103565214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10168664.2021.1894631

DO - 10.1080/10168664.2021.1894631

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85103565214

SN - 1016-8664

VL - 31

SP - 208

EP - 215

JO - Structural Engineering International

JF - Structural Engineering International

IS - 2

ER -

Postdiction of the Flexural Shear Capacity of a Deep Beam Without Stirrups Using NLFEM

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this