Prophages are associated with extensive CRISPR-Cas auto-immunity

Franklin L. Nobrega, Hielke Walinga, Bas E. Dutilh, Stan J.J. Brouns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas systems require discriminating self from non-self DNA during adaptation and interference. Yet, multiple cases have been reported of bacteria containing self-targeting spacers (STS), i.e. CRISPR spacers targeting protospacers on the same genome. STS has been suggested to reflect potential auto-immunity as an unwanted side effect of CRISPR-Cas defense, or a regulatory mechanism for gene expression. Here we investigated the incidence, distribution, and evasion of STS in over 100 000 bacterial genomes. We found STS in all CRISPR-Cas types and in one fifth of all CRISPR-carrying bacteria. Notably, up to 40% of I-B and I-F CRISPR-Cas systems contained STS. We observed that STS-containing genomes almost always carry a prophage and that STS map to prophage regions in more than half of the cases. Despite carrying STS, genetic deterioration of CRISPR-Cas systems appears to be rare, suggesting a level of escape from the potentially deleterious effects of STS by other mechanisms such as anti-CRISPR proteins and CRISPR target mutations. We propose a scenario where it is common to acquire an STS against a prophage, and this may trigger more extensive STS buildup by primed spacer acquisition in type I systems, without detrimental autoimmunity effects as mechanisms of auto-immunity evasion create tolerance to STS-targeted prophages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12074-12084
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume48
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prophages are associated with extensive CRISPR-Cas auto-immunity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this