Public acceptance in direct potable water reuse: a call for incorporating responsible research and innovation

Karen Moesker*, Udo Pesch, Neelke Doorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As global issues such as climate change and diminishing resources become increasingly pressing, water recycling has moved into the focus. However, the successful implementation of Direct Potable Water Reuse (DPR) projects hinges on securing public acceptance, which remains challenging. This paper aims to flesh out possible reasons for the lingering public rejection of DPR. We will do so by conducting a literature review on how public acceptance is understood and what approaches are proposed to enhance it. These approaches are analyzed using Responsible Research and Innovation principles and the `opening up', `closing down' and `leaving ajar' approaches. Our research identifies an overreliance on the controversial information deficit model, closing down large parts of public engagement. We advocate for becoming more inclusive through the `leaving ajar' approach. Particularly, attention should be paid to reflexivity and responsiveness to public concerns to ensure meaningful public engagement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2304382
JournalJournal of Responsible Innovation
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Direct potable reuse
  • information deficit model
  • public acceptance
  • public participation
  • responsible research and innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public acceptance in direct potable water reuse: a call for incorporating responsible research and innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this