Quantification of Embodied Energy and Carbon Footprint of Pervious Concrete Pavements through a Methodical Lifecycle Assessment Framework

This study provided a systematic lifecycle assessment (LCA) methodology that was used to quantify the total embodied energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions involved in construction of a new pavement. Furthermore, a comparative LCA was performed to adjudge the benefits offered by pervious concrete pavement (PCP) over Portland cement concrete pavement (PCCP) for different mixing procedures, and distinct base layers. The system boundaries included the following phases of pavement LCA: raw material production, transportation, and pavement construction. The total embodied energy and GHG emissions were quantified for a functional unit of 1 km single lane road, 3.5 m wide, and 0.35 m thickness. The relative contribution of each component to energy consumption and GHG emissions was estimated and the variability of LCA model parameters was understood using sensitivity analysis. The results dictated that the total embodied energy and GHG emissions in PCP with aggregate base layer were reduced by up to 3% and 2.7%, respectively, compared to that of PCCP with similar configuration. Further, a capital cost analysis was conducted due to non-availability of maintenance and end-of-life data, which indicated that PCP is almost 1.21% costlier than PCCP for RMC mixing, and 4.13% cheaper for in-situ mixing. The conceptual approach developed in this study provided a generalized methodical framework that could be used to assess the environmental credibility of pavement systems for site-specific conditions.