TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying climate risks to infrastructure systems: A comparative review of developments across infrastructure sectors
AU - Verschuur, Jasper
AU - Fernández-Pérez, Alberto
AU - Mühlhofer, Evelyn
AU - Nirandjan, Sadhana
AU - Borgomeo, Edoardo
AU - Becher, Olivia
AU - Voskaki, Asimina
AU - Oughton, Edward J.
AU - Stankovski, Andrej
AU - Greco, Salvatore F.
AU - Koks, Elco E.
AU - Pant, Raghav
AU - Hall, Jim W.
A2 - Thaler, Thomas
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Infrastructure systems are particularly vulnerable to climate hazards, such as flooding, wildfires, cyclones and temperature fluctuations. Responding to these threats in a proportionate and targeted way requires quantitative analysis of climate risks, which underpins infrastructure resilience and adaptation strategies. The aim of this paper is to review the recent developments in quantitative climate risk analysis for key infrastructure sectors, including water and wastewater, telecommunications, health and education, transport (seaports, airports, road, rail and inland waterways), and energy (generation, transmission and distribution). We identify several overarching research gaps, which include the (i) limited consideration of multi-hazard and multi-infrastructure interactions within a single modelling framework, (ii) scarcity of studies focusing on certain combinations of climate hazards and infrastructure types, (iii) difficulties in scaling-up climate risk analysis across geographies, (iv) increasing challenge of validating models, (v) untapped potential of further knowledge spillovers across sectors, (vi) need to embed equity considerations into modelling frameworks, and (vii) quantifying a wider set of impact metrics. We argue that a cross-sectoral systems approach enables knowledge sharing and a better integration of infrastructure interdependencies between multiple sectors.
AB - Infrastructure systems are particularly vulnerable to climate hazards, such as flooding, wildfires, cyclones and temperature fluctuations. Responding to these threats in a proportionate and targeted way requires quantitative analysis of climate risks, which underpins infrastructure resilience and adaptation strategies. The aim of this paper is to review the recent developments in quantitative climate risk analysis for key infrastructure sectors, including water and wastewater, telecommunications, health and education, transport (seaports, airports, road, rail and inland waterways), and energy (generation, transmission and distribution). We identify several overarching research gaps, which include the (i) limited consideration of multi-hazard and multi-infrastructure interactions within a single modelling framework, (ii) scarcity of studies focusing on certain combinations of climate hazards and infrastructure types, (iii) difficulties in scaling-up climate risk analysis across geographies, (iv) increasing challenge of validating models, (v) untapped potential of further knowledge spillovers across sectors, (vi) need to embed equity considerations into modelling frameworks, and (vii) quantifying a wider set of impact metrics. We argue that a cross-sectoral systems approach enables knowledge sharing and a better integration of infrastructure interdependencies between multiple sectors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193952579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000331
DO - 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000331
M3 - Review article
SN - 2767-3200
VL - 3
JO - PLOS Climate
JF - PLOS Climate
IS - 4
M1 - e0000331
ER -