Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science

Michele Avissar-Whiting, Frédérique Belliard, Stefano M. Bertozzi, Amy Brand, Katherine Brown, Géraldine Clément-Stoneham, et al.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    6 Citations (SciVal)
    45 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Peer review is an important part of the scientific process, but traditional peer review at journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As preprints become more widely used and accepted, they raise the possibility of rethinking the peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial than traditional journal peer review, and to thus fundamentally shift the culture of peer review toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call to action to stakeholders in the community to accelerate the growing momentum of preprint sharing and provide recommendations to empower researchers to provide open and constructive peer review for preprints.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere3002502
    JournalPLoS biology
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this