Reference study of IFC software support: The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I

Francesca Noardo*, Thomas Krijnen, Ken Arroyo Ohori, Filip Biljecki, Claire Ellul, Lars Harrie, Nebras Salheb, Jordi van Liempt, Jantien Stoter, More Authors

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)


Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), the buildingSMART open standard for BIM, is underused with respect to its promising potential, since, according to the experience of practitioners and researchers working with BIM, issues in the standard’s implementation and use prevent its effective use. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been carried out, and there is thus insufficient evidence for tackling the problems. The GeoBIM benchmark project is aimed at finding such evidence by involving external volunteers, reporting on various aspects of the behavior of tools (geometry, semantics, georeferencing, functionalities), analyzed and described in this article. Interestingly, different IFC software programs with the same standardized data sets yield inconsistent results, with few detectable common patterns, and significant issues are found in their support of the standard, probably due to the very high complexity of the standard data model. A companion article (Part II) describes the results of the benchmark related to CityGML, the counterpart of IFC within geoinformation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)805-841
Number of pages37
JournalTransactions in GIS
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2021


  • building information models
  • GeoBIM
  • Industry Foundation Classes
  • interoperability
  • open standards
  • software support


Dive into the research topics of 'Reference study of IFC software support: The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this