Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Refractions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedings/Edited volumeChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter discusses sustainability first as a “contested concept” and then as a discursive field. Based on the accounts given in previous chapters, the four refracted meanings of sustainability are critically evaluated based on three elements: complexity, futurity, and agency. Complexity because sustainability involves a dense network of human and nonhuman actors, material and cultural imperatives whose interactions often lead to unanticipated, emergent consequences. Futurity because from its very beginning, sustainability sought to shift human temporal horizons, considerations, and responsibilities from the “here and now” to the future. And agency because sustainability implies that humans have the capacity to intervene and make the world a better place.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPalgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication
EditorsAnders Hansen, Steve Depoe
PublisherPalgrave MacMillan Publishers
Pages165-184
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)2634-646X
ISBN (Print)2634-6451
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NamePalgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication
ISSN (Print)2634-6451
ISSN (Electronic)2634-646X

Keywords

  • Felt Relation
  • Information Deficit Model
  • Persuasive Interaction
  • Sustainability
  • Synoptic Interactions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Refractions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this