Reinventing planning and planners: Ideological decontestations and rhetorical appeals

Simin Davoudi, Daniel Galland, Dominic Stead

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    77 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article contributes to the debate about ideologically motivated planning reforms. It aims to advance the debate by exploring how change is legitimised through forms of rhetorical persuasion. It shows how political ideologies become embedded in planning policies and practices through strategies of legitimation aimed at justifying specific ideas, beliefs and values as self-evident and inevitable. These legitimation strategies rely on distinctive rhetorical appeals to steer planning discourses, policies and institutions. By using short illustrative examples of ‘ideology in action’ from Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands, the article shows that various combinations of rhetorical appeals to logos, ethos, pathos and doxa (logic, character, emotion and identity) are often simultaneously at work to naturalise contested planning reforms.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)17-37
    Number of pages21
    JournalPlanning Theory
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Keywords

    • legitimation
    • planning reforms
    • political ideologies
    • rhetorical appeals

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reinventing planning and planners: Ideological decontestations and rhetorical appeals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this