TY - JOUR
T1 - Reproducibility of Natural Shear Wave Elastography Measurements
AU - Keijzer, Lana B.H.
AU - Strachinaru, Mihai
AU - Bowen, Dan J.
AU - Geleijnse, Marcel L.
AU - van der Steen, Antonius F.W.
AU - Bosch, Johan G.
AU - de Jong, Nico
AU - Vos, Hendrik J.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - For the quantification of myocardial function, myocardial stiffness can potentially be measured non-invasively using shear wave elastography. Clinical diagnosis requires high precision. In 10 healthy volunteers, we studied the reproducibility of the measurement of propagation speeds of shear waves induced by aortic and mitral valve closure (AVC, MVC). Inter-scan was slightly higher but in similar ranges as intra-scan variability (AVC: 0.67 m/s (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.40–0.86 m/s) versus 0.38 m/s (IQR: 0.26–0.68 m/s), MVC: 0.61 m/s (IQR: 0.26–0.94 m/s) versus 0.26 m/s (IQR: 0.15–0.46 m/s)). For AVC, the propagation speeds obtained on different day were not statistically different (p = 0.13). We observed different propagation speeds between 2 systems (AVC: 3.23–4.25 m/s [Zonare ZS3] versus 1.82–4.76 m/s [Philips iE33]), p = 0.04). No statistical difference was observed between observers (AVC: p = 0.35). Our results suggest that measurement inaccuracies dominate the variabilities measured among healthy volunteers. Therefore, measurement precision can be improved by averaging over multiple heartbeats.
AB - For the quantification of myocardial function, myocardial stiffness can potentially be measured non-invasively using shear wave elastography. Clinical diagnosis requires high precision. In 10 healthy volunteers, we studied the reproducibility of the measurement of propagation speeds of shear waves induced by aortic and mitral valve closure (AVC, MVC). Inter-scan was slightly higher but in similar ranges as intra-scan variability (AVC: 0.67 m/s (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.40–0.86 m/s) versus 0.38 m/s (IQR: 0.26–0.68 m/s), MVC: 0.61 m/s (IQR: 0.26–0.94 m/s) versus 0.26 m/s (IQR: 0.15–0.46 m/s)). For AVC, the propagation speeds obtained on different day were not statistically different (p = 0.13). We observed different propagation speeds between 2 systems (AVC: 3.23–4.25 m/s [Zonare ZS3] versus 1.82–4.76 m/s [Philips iE33]), p = 0.04). No statistical difference was observed between observers (AVC: p = 0.35). Our results suggest that measurement inaccuracies dominate the variabilities measured among healthy volunteers. Therefore, measurement precision can be improved by averaging over multiple heartbeats.
KW - Elastography
KW - High frame rate
KW - Natural shear wave elastography
KW - Shear waves
KW - stiffness
KW - Tissue elasticity imaging
KW - Valve closure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072622425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.09.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85072622425
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 45
SP - 3172
EP - 3185
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 12
ER -