TY - JOUR
T1 - Research on shutdown purge characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells
T2 - Purge parameters conspicuity and residual water
AU - Zhang, Zhenya
AU - Wei, Houyu
AU - Xiao, Yanqiu
AU - Cheng, Chuanxiao
AU - Tian, Jiean
AU - Li, Xinxin
AU - Liu, Junrui
AU - Liu, Zhengxuan
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This paper comprehensively investigates the purge mechanism of proton exchange membrane fuel cells during the shutdown process, which qualitatively examines the effect of purge parameters (including current density, stoichiometric ratio, and relative humidity) on water content variation, and further quantitatively investigates the remaining water content post-purge. In contrast to previous studies, this paper offers a novel perspective on analyzing the purge process and conducts a thorough examination of residual water content. This study presents a transient, isothermal, two-phase flow model for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, which is subsequently validated experimentally. Results indicate that the significance of purge parameters follows the descending order: stoichiometric ratio, relative humidity, and current density. During the purge, the stoichiometric ratio should be rapidly increased to above 9. Each incremental rise in the stoichiometric ratio from 6 to 14 leads to a respective reduction in residual membrane water content after purge of 2.19 %, 1.57 %, 1.18 %, 0.93 %, 0.76 %, 0.63 %, 0.53 %, and 0.46 %. Similarly, it is recommended to swiftly decrease relative humidity to below 40 %. Elevating the purge current density from 20 to 200 mA/cm2 decreases the time required to completely remove liquid water from 20.24 s to 6.59 s. Hence, employing a higher current density at the onset of the purge facilitates quicker removal of liquid water, albeit resulting in an increase in residual membrane water content post-purge, from 3.17 to 3.70. In summary, optimizing the purge strategy requires adjusting purge current densities according to the specific purge stage.
AB - This paper comprehensively investigates the purge mechanism of proton exchange membrane fuel cells during the shutdown process, which qualitatively examines the effect of purge parameters (including current density, stoichiometric ratio, and relative humidity) on water content variation, and further quantitatively investigates the remaining water content post-purge. In contrast to previous studies, this paper offers a novel perspective on analyzing the purge process and conducts a thorough examination of residual water content. This study presents a transient, isothermal, two-phase flow model for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, which is subsequently validated experimentally. Results indicate that the significance of purge parameters follows the descending order: stoichiometric ratio, relative humidity, and current density. During the purge, the stoichiometric ratio should be rapidly increased to above 9. Each incremental rise in the stoichiometric ratio from 6 to 14 leads to a respective reduction in residual membrane water content after purge of 2.19 %, 1.57 %, 1.18 %, 0.93 %, 0.76 %, 0.63 %, 0.53 %, and 0.46 %. Similarly, it is recommended to swiftly decrease relative humidity to below 40 %. Elevating the purge current density from 20 to 200 mA/cm2 decreases the time required to completely remove liquid water from 20.24 s to 6.59 s. Hence, employing a higher current density at the onset of the purge facilitates quicker removal of liquid water, albeit resulting in an increase in residual membrane water content post-purge, from 3.17 to 3.70. In summary, optimizing the purge strategy requires adjusting purge current densities according to the specific purge stage.
KW - Conspicuity analysis of purge parameters
KW - Proton exchange membrane fuel cell
KW - Purge strategy
KW - Residual water
KW - Shutdown purge characteristics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193604783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123437
DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123437
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193604783
SN - 1359-4311
VL - 249
JO - Applied Thermal Engineering
JF - Applied Thermal Engineering
M1 - 123437
ER -