TY - JOUR
T1 - Review article
T2 - Towards a context-driven research: A state-of-the-art review of resilience research on climate change
AU - Ossewaarde, Ringo
AU - Filatova, Tatiana
AU - Georgiadou, Yola
AU - Hartmann, Andreas
AU - Ozerol, Gul
AU - Pfeffer, Karin
AU - Stegmaier, Peter
AU - Torenvlied, Rene
AU - Van Der Voort, Mascha
AU - Warmink, Jord
AU - Borsje, Bas
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The twofold aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of resilience research with regard to climate change in the social sciences and propose a research agenda. Resilience research among social scientists is characterized by much more diversity today than a few decades ago. Different definitions and understandings of resilience appear in publications during the last 10 years. Resilience research increasingly bears the mark of social constructivism, a relative newcomer compared to the more long-standing tradition of naturalism. There are also approaches that are indebted to both "naturalism" and "constructivism", which, of course, come in many varieties. Based on our overview of recent scholarship, which is far from being exhaustive, we have identified six research avenues that arguably deserve continued attention. They combine naturalist and constructivist insights and approaches so that human agency, reflexivity, and considerations of justice and equity are incorporated into systems thinking research or supplement such research. Ultimately, we believe that the overarching challenge for future research is to ensure that resilience to climate change does not compromise sustainability and considerations of justice (including environmental, climate, and energy justice)..
AB - The twofold aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of resilience research with regard to climate change in the social sciences and propose a research agenda. Resilience research among social scientists is characterized by much more diversity today than a few decades ago. Different definitions and understandings of resilience appear in publications during the last 10 years. Resilience research increasingly bears the mark of social constructivism, a relative newcomer compared to the more long-standing tradition of naturalism. There are also approaches that are indebted to both "naturalism" and "constructivism", which, of course, come in many varieties. Based on our overview of recent scholarship, which is far from being exhaustive, we have identified six research avenues that arguably deserve continued attention. They combine naturalist and constructivist insights and approaches so that human agency, reflexivity, and considerations of justice and equity are incorporated into systems thinking research or supplement such research. Ultimately, we believe that the overarching challenge for future research is to ensure that resilience to climate change does not compromise sustainability and considerations of justice (including environmental, climate, and energy justice)..
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103455383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/nhess-21-1119-2021
DO - 10.5194/nhess-21-1119-2021
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85103455383
SN - 1561-8633
VL - 21
SP - 1119
EP - 1133
JO - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
JF - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
IS - 3
ER -