TY - JOUR
T1 - Riblet-generated flow mechanisms that lead to local breaking of Reynolds analogy
AU - Rouhi, Amirreza
AU - Endrikat, Sebastian
AU - Modesti, D.
AU - Sandberg, Richard D.
AU - Oda, Takuo
AU - Tanimoto, Koichi
AU - Hutchins, Nicholas
AU - Chung, Daniel
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We investigate the Reynolds analogy over riblets, namely the analogy between the fractional increase in Stanton number Ch and the fractional increase in the skin-friction coefficient Cf, relative to a smooth surface. We investigate the direct numerical simulation data of Endrikat et al. (Flow Turbul. Combust., vol. 107, 2021, pp. 1–29). The riblet groove shapes are isosceles triangles with tip angles α=30∘,60∘,90∘, a trapezoid, a rectangle and a right triangle. The viscous-scaled riblet spacing varies between s+≈10 to 60. The global Reynolds analogy is primarily influenced by Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers and secondary flows. Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers locally break the Reynolds analogy favourably, i.e. cause a locally larger fractional increase in Ch than in Cf. These rollers induce negative wall shear stress patches which have no analogue in wall heat fluxes. Secondary flows at the riblets’ crests are associated with local unfavourable breaking of the Reynolds analogy, i.e. locally larger fractional increase in Cf than in Ch. Only the triangular riblets with α=30∘ trigger strong Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers without appreciable secondary flows. This riblet shape globally preserves the Reynolds analogy from s+=21 to 33. However, the other riblet shapes have weak or non-existent Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers, yet persistent secondary flows. These riblet shapes behave similarly to rough surfaces. They unfavourably break the global Reynolds analogy, and do so to a greater extent as s+ increases.
AB - We investigate the Reynolds analogy over riblets, namely the analogy between the fractional increase in Stanton number Ch and the fractional increase in the skin-friction coefficient Cf, relative to a smooth surface. We investigate the direct numerical simulation data of Endrikat et al. (Flow Turbul. Combust., vol. 107, 2021, pp. 1–29). The riblet groove shapes are isosceles triangles with tip angles α=30∘,60∘,90∘, a trapezoid, a rectangle and a right triangle. The viscous-scaled riblet spacing varies between s+≈10 to 60. The global Reynolds analogy is primarily influenced by Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers and secondary flows. Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers locally break the Reynolds analogy favourably, i.e. cause a locally larger fractional increase in Ch than in Cf. These rollers induce negative wall shear stress patches which have no analogue in wall heat fluxes. Secondary flows at the riblets’ crests are associated with local unfavourable breaking of the Reynolds analogy, i.e. locally larger fractional increase in Cf than in Ch. Only the triangular riblets with α=30∘ trigger strong Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers without appreciable secondary flows. This riblet shape globally preserves the Reynolds analogy from s+=21 to 33. However, the other riblet shapes have weak or non-existent Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers, yet persistent secondary flows. These riblet shapes behave similarly to rough surfaces. They unfavourably break the global Reynolds analogy, and do so to a greater extent as s+ increases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142071930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/jfm.2022.880
DO - 10.1017/jfm.2022.880
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-1120
VL - 951
JO - Journal of Fluid Mechanics
JF - Journal of Fluid Mechanics
M1 - A45
ER -