Robots and us: towards an economics of the ‘Good Life’

C. W.M. Naastepad*, Jesse M. Mulder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
165 Downloads (Pure)


(Expected) adverse effects of the ‘ICT Revolution’ on work and opportunities for individuals to use and develop their capacities give a new impetus to the debate on the societal implications of technology and raise questions regarding the ‘responsibility’ of research and innovation (RRI) and the possibility of achieving ‘inclusive and sustainable society’. However, missing in this debate is an examination of a possible conflict between the quest for ‘inclusive and sustainable society’ and conventional economic principles guiding capital allocation (including the funding of research and innovation). We propose that such conflict can be resolved by re-examining the nature and purpose of capital, and by recognising mainstream economics’ utilitarian foundations as an unduly restrictive subset of a wider Aristotelian understanding of choice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-33
Number of pages33
JournalReview of Social Economy
Publication statusPublished - 2018


  • Philosophical foundations of economics
  • homo economicus
  • responsible research and innovation (RRI)
  • capital
  • productivity growth
  • ICT
  • IT
  • Aristotle
  • golden mean
  • inclusive society
  • telos
  • technological unemployment


Dive into the research topics of 'Robots and us: towards an economics of the ‘Good Life’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this